Policymakers Speak-Out, continued...

Forum Sponsored By

 

Do community demographics change following joint-use school projects? Gail Goldberg, planning director for the City of San Diego, answers “You’ve got to revitalize for the community who lives there. It’s not about gentrifying the neighborhood so new people can move in.” 

Gov. Gray Davis’s administration “believes passionately in the holistic approach … it is the only thing that works and it’s the best way to solve problems.” – state Secretary of Consumer Affairs Aileen Adams

“We need to move forward to do the planning for another 35 schools, not knowing what the schools will look like …. The whole process we have to go through to do joint-use doesn’t facilitate long-term planning.” – Jay Schenirer, Sacramento school board member

 “AB 1481 (would) create the state permit parks program. If Proposition 40 passes, there will be $260 million to this program … it (would be) the first time the state has actually said we’re going to help communities build new parks.” – Assemblyman Dario Frommer

Los Angeles Unified School District facilities executive Kathi Littman, on her arrival at the district two years ago: “We were in triage … 15,000 students were bused daily, even on multi-track calendars and with portables covering playgrounds. We were beginning to need joint-credentialed bus drivers and teachers, because students couldn’t get off the bus.”

Littman on converting school facilities for joint use: “LAUSD can barely keep toilets and athletic fields operating as it is. Now they want them to be used on nights and weekends? The state should increase the capacity for multiuse by offering reimbursement for upfront costs.”

“The business community will support the removal of barriers (to joint use). Proposition 39 already made a difference … we need to be efficient. Otherwise voters will stop approving bonds.” – William Huack, California Business Roundtable

“State standards around Smart Growth and sustainable communities can be definitively linked in the bond language.” – Andrew Michael, Bay Area Alliance for Sustainable Development

Assemblymember Pat Wiggins called the bond "the most important land use measure this session."

State Senator Dede Alpert said "The School Bond Conference Committee will continue in business for the rest of the session and welcomes input from across the state."

Don Attore of the California Teachers Association suggested involving teachers and students early on in the planning process, “not when you’re deciding which colors and which furniture, but when you’re picking out where to put the walls.”

Rick Simpson, from Assemblyman Hertzberg’s office said that he "welcomes input from all parts of the state to incentivize joint-use school siting."

 

 

back to eSummary Arrow


and by

This Forum is the second in a two- part series. Be certain to check out the first forum's eSummary.

 

Subscribe to the eSummary

 


More CPF Resources

Forum Summary

Forum Agenda

Forum Pictures

Forum Presenters

Schedule of Forums

See Past Forums

Forward this eSummary to a friend

 

 

 

 

 

Please visit www.calpolicyforum.net for more information.

About CPF
 
The California Policy Project seeks to  create opportunities for California citizens and leaders to meet, discuss, and find common ground on sensible long-term reforms to the state's land use, fiscal, and governmental policies, and to educate and engage policy-makers in collaborative efforts to implement these reforms.

California Policy Forum Network Partners

Foundation Supporters
The California Policy Forum (CPF) is made possible through the generosity of the James Irvine Foundation and the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. To learn more about CPF, please visit www.calpolicyforum.net.

We encourage widespread distribution of this eSummary.
Please Forward it to a Friend


Powered by Grassroots Enterprise, Inc.